Dealing with Culture Shock: The Aviation and Health Care Industries

One of my favorite things to do is travel. Traveling provides me with an unmatched exhilarating sense of adventure. Whenever I casually walk down an unknown bustling street, my sense are overloaded with new sights and smells. This kind of excitement is unbelievably addicting. My mind just races with comments. What is that brilliant green dress she’s wearing made of? Can you really eat that? Whoa, where did all of those chickens come from? Did those kids just point and laugh at me? Is his cell phone really that tiny? Why is everyone so tall?

Do I ever experience culture shock? Sure. Every new environment will take some time to adjust to, but the challenges of getting around and living outside of my comfortable apartment in Michigan is all part of the fun of traveling.

What about the culture shock of transitioning from one industry of work into another? The University of Michigan IHI Open School Chapter’s Monthly Speaker Series guest, Gary Sculli, probably does not have many positive feelings associated with his move from the airline industry into health care. Gary Sculli is currently a Program Manager at the National Center for Patient Safety in Ann Arbor, MI. He has both extensive experience as an airline pilot and is a registered nurse.

As Sculli starkly contrasted the two industries, it was clear that the airline industry and health care were two very different beasts. While it may have been difficult for me to adjust to taking cold showers while I was in Ghana, “traumatic” would be the word I’d choose to describe a move into health care from the airline industry. Here are some differences at a quick glance.

Airlines	Health Care
Team training	Hierarchical barriers
Human Factor awareness	Human Factors NOT emphasized
Standardization	Varying degrees of standardization
Checklists discipline	Expectation to complete outside functions
Formalized recurrent training	Haphazard recurrent training
FAA mandated performance checking	Absence of mandatory performance checking

Not only are there differences in work environment between the two fields, but health care is associated with higher error rates—rates that make up the harrowing statistic of up to 98,000 deaths a year due to medical errors, published in the IOM Report, To Err is Human in 1999. A recent study evaluating quality improvement in health care’s progress since the publication of To Err is Human reports the sobering fact that not much has changed. Just as many people become victims of medical error today. While a lot of improvements have been made, we still have a long way to go. According to the Joint Commission, at the root of many of the errors we see in health care are communication and organizational culture. So, what health care needs is a cultural transformation. With the likes of Gary Sculli, we are well on our way on the journey towards safer health care.

Being flexible and keeping an open mind are two important items to pack when traveling to ensure a positive experience. Gary Sculli surely did not forget to pack these on his move. He took the lemons he found in health care and made lemonade by applying effective communication and leadership strategies practiced in the airline industry to health care in order to make health care more effective and reliable. In his discussion, Sculli outlined the concept of crew resource management as a team building effort to not just strive towards eliminating error, but more importantly, how to manage error when it does occur. He also discussed different leadership styles, being a dictator or facilitator, and the health care consequences associated with each. What else is needed to make health care more reliable? Sculli illustrated the need to redesign health care to support “situational awareness,” being able to perceive, comprehend, project, make decisions, and perform actions on variation in one’s environment. Check out the University of Michigan IHI Open School website for more information on topics discussed at the Monthly Speaker Series event.

The application of many of these airline tools have been able to make some great changes in health care. With the use of checklists, many hospitals have been able to effectively standardize procedures and eliminate hospital acquired infections. Through communication training among the staff of the operating room, physicians have been shown to be more adept at soliciting feedback and taking appropriate actions, while nurses and other members of the OR team have moved away from the “hinting and hoping” strategy of declaring an error to providing feedback in a direct, concise, and specific manner.

Perhaps what I love most about traveling is that once you move past the initial jolt of shock that the differences of a new location can give you, people are really all the same. I’ve learned so much from the cultures and people I have interacted with on my travels and have adopted some of these practices into my daily life. Personally, these adopted practices have made my life better. Is health care really so different from the airline industry? They are both fields that include teams of individuals performing highly specialized skills with extreme risk and small margins of acceptable error. With the help of inspiring leaders like Gary Sculli, health care is adopting the best practices from other industries. If we keep moving in this direction, I’m sure the next culture shock health care will give is one of success that we can all be proud of.

News Flash!

U-M hospitals win award for being one of the nation's safest by Leapfrog! Click here to read more!

Gut Check: University of Michigan's Medical Error Disclosure Program

We're all familiar with the story of George Washington and the cherry tree that gave rise to the famous line, "I cannot tell a lie, father, you know I cannot tell a lie!"

What motivated him to tell the truth? Was it some sort of rumbling gut feeling that told him that it was the right thing to do? Probably the same motivating forces that led the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS) to transition to a medical error disclosure program that is fully integrated with the hospital's quality improvement and patient safety efforts in 2001.

Unfortunately, our health care world today is one in which we don't follow George Washington's leadership. Medical malpractice is guided by a "deny and defend" approach. Insurers and counsels often urge secrecy, dispute fault, deflect responsibility, and make it as slow and expensive as possible for patients to continue the already unfavorable process. As a result of this approach, it's not uncommon for medical lawsuits to take five or more years to resolve. Information about the cause of injuries is also denied to patients and families for long periods of time, compensation is unavailable to those who most need it. Worst of all, there is little meaningful quality feedback for providers. Patients and providers are placed in adversarial positions, allowing fear to fester in between.

Turning the current, "deny and defend" approach to medical liability on its head, the current system at UMHS emphasizes full honesty and transparency between staff and patients and encourages the participation of risk management, regardless if a medical error is involved. At UMHS Medical errors are identified and collected by all staff, patients, and family members. Experienced risk managers with a clinical background investigate the claims, and care quality is evaluated. The system's three guiding principles are:

1. Compensate quickly and fairly when unreasonable medical care causes injury.

2. Defend medically reasonable care vigorously.

3. Reduce patient injuries (and therefore claims) by learning from patient's experiences

Most importantly, conclusions of the investigation are shared.



We were fortunate to have Rick Boothman, UMHS Chief Risk Officer, join the University of Michigan's IHI Open School for our first Monthly Speaker Series event of the year to discuss UMHS's medical error disclosure program. Boothman's presentation was focused on the underlying principles of quality improvement that help inform the disclosure program.

Boothman's extensive experience as a trial lawyer has given him a strong and almost intuitive sense about cases that he can almost accurately predict if he can win a case. But, he does what he refers to as a "gut check." Would he accept this kind of care for his own mother?

The undercurrent of quality improvement has led to some great results. As reported in the Annals of Internal Medicine in a paper written by Allen Kachalia et. al., with implementation of UMHS's disclosure-with-offer program, the average monthly rate of new claims decreased from 7.03 to 4.52 per 100,000 patient encounters. The average monthly rate of lawsuits decreased from 2.13 to 0.75 per 100,000 patient encounters. The median time from claim reporting to resolution decreased from 1.36 to 0.95 years. Average monthly cost rates decreased for total liability, patient compensation, and non-compensation-related legal costs.

A system that makes patients and physicians happier...and saves money at the same time? My gut is telling me that this is a system that we should take a look at.

Patient Centered Medical Home: An Anchor in the Ocean of Health Care?

The health care system is a ruthless and turbulent ocean. For many patients, even a regular visit to the doctor can be quite unforgiving. With patient safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, efficiency, timeliness, and equity concerns, health care visits can feel like navigating the ocean on a flimsy fishing boat. Now that we are transitioning into the phase of implementing and executing health reform, we must push patient-centeredness to the forefront of all our efforts to inform us on how to improve the quality of our health care system.

For example, the concept of the medical home that many say will transform health care into a more coordinated and comprehensive system isn’t just implementing electronic medical records, restructuring care teams that group physicians, nurses, physician assistants and other allied health workers together, redefining scheduling, or figuring out how to pay for these new services. The medical home needs to be a patient-centered medical home—one that actively engages the patient’s needs and concerns. Our system’s struggles with achieving patient-centered care is most evident in how health care providers deliver bad news to patients...

Read the full post at the IHI Open School Blog

Lunch with Dr. Dean Gruner

The IHI Open School is a great resource for learning from the leaders in the health care field. As the first educational event of the year, five IHI members had a causal lunch with Dr. Dean Gruner, the president and CEO of ThedaCare. He described the lean processes his Wisconsin-based health system put in place to dramatically improve patient care. We learned about the beginnings of the program, his leadership style, and his thoughts on quality improvement. It was a wonderful opportunity to get a personal look at how the initiatives IHI promotes work on the ground. At the end of the hour, we joined him in a larger lecture where he talked in more detail about the cultural changes associated with quality improvement.

Dr. Jack Billi, the Associate Vice President of Medical Affairs at UMHS, joined us for lunch to add his perspective on lean process. Dr. Billi will come to the Open School in October to lead a lean training session. Watch this space for more information about these sessions and more opportunities to meet leaders in our field!

Steve Brown
Ross School of Business

The Gift of Stories

...My first year of medical school was defined by the time I spent in anatomy. I spent hours probing through various anatomical structure and yet I feel like I only scratched the surface in my pursuit of medical scholarship. But what I did larn during those hours in anatomy lab, as I slowly built an intimate rapport with my first patient, was the invaluable lesson of the joy and fulfillment gained through listening to the stories of every bump, kink, and scar. It is the magnetic draw for these patient narratives that led me to inevitably mature from the dangerous narratives of attempting surgical procedures on myself to attending medical school and working towards becoming a doctor. Your special gift, my first patient narrative, is one that will always stay with me as I continue to learn and never stop listening...

Delivered at the University of Michigan Medical School Anatomical Donations Memorial Service (Sept. 15, 2010)

Click here to read more on the IHI Open School Blog.

Preparing for the Future

This summer, while I was traveling around Ghana conducting clinical quality and management research focusing specifically on the changes posting an OB/GYN specialist in district hospitals has on the hospital and the immediate community, my classmate Charlotte was busy administering a laparoscopic surgery training module to bring the technology of laparoscopy to Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana. Laparoscopic surgery, especially for gynecological surgeries, has been available to developed countries for at least 20 years, but this minimally invasive form of surgery has yet to become standard practice in Ghana. The benefits of laparoscopic surgery are many. It is cosmetically favored by patients and medically, reduces complications like hemorrhaging and has shorter recovery times. It is no exaggeration to say that Charlotte's work is ushering Ghana into a new surgical future that will bring a tremendous amount of public health benefit.

In 1910, Abraham Flexner's report titled, "Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching" ushered and shaped medical education into it's current form. The Flexner Report called for standardization of medical education that was rooted in sound and rigorous biomedical and clinical science challenging the American and Canadian medical education systems to train the highest quality of physicians. Flexner, not a physician himself, wrote a book-length report that was framed with the greater society in mind. He wrote, "The public interest is then paramount, and when public interest, professional ideals, and sound educational procedure concur in the recommendation of the same policy, the time is surely ripe for decisive action."

It has been 100 years since the publication of the Flexner Report and with 100 years of experience of modern medical education, we are due for some reflection on the alignment of the medical education system and the public interest. In an article published in Academic Medicine, Drs. Don Berwick and Jon Finkelstein write and discuss a, let's call it "Flexner Report 2.0", shaping a medical education system that will better prepare physicians to meet the needs of a today's world of health care. Read the article here.

In the article Berwick and Finkelstein outline new values that should complement the current emphasis on biomedical science we receive in medical school. These values include "patient-centeredness, transparency, and stewardship of limited societal resources for health care." There is no time in the current curriculum to add on training in these new skills, many educators would argue. Berwick and Finkelstein also review the innovative programs, including the IHI Open School, that attempt to provide medical students and residents with a foundation in these new skills, as well as outlining a new frame of reference for medical curriculum change that will incorporate these invaluable skills. I certainly can't reproduce Berwick and Finkelstein's eloquence, so I will leave the explanation of the fine details to the article. Definitely a must-read!

In the 100 years since the publication of the Flexner Report, the medical education system has trained millions of physicians who have dramatically transformed health care. It was this cohort of physicians that popularized laparoscopic surgery! Looking just at performance outcomes, we have made incredible gains in both the length and quality of life for our patients. However, there is much more we can do. If we adopt Berwick and Finkelstein's recommendations, we will be poised to create a new physician workforce adept at navigating and continually improving the complexities of health care to consistently meet patient needs. We all need to collectively reflect on and brainstorm innovative interventions to fold the skills of systems thinking into our current medical education system. If we can develop the technology of laparoscopic surgery, I'm confident that we too can succeed in reinventing ourselves to better treat our patients with the tools of quality improvement. In 100 years, the world will surely look very different. I'm imagining a modern metropolis not unlike the life of the Jetsons. But, what will medicine look like? What kinds of public health accomplishments can we celebrate in the next 100 years? Let's work together to reshape medical education so that we will have plenty to celebrate in the future!

What do you think of the Berwick and Finkelstein paper? Leave a comment!

Read more posts on the IHI Open School Blog

Project Fives Alive: Two Days of Energizing Inspiration

Karni QI Team

In typical last-minute Eva fashion, two years ago, I decided to defer from medical school for a year to work at the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). IHI can be best described as a fast-paced social change organization that operates like a cross between a think tank and consulting firm that focuses on improving the delivery of health care through spreading systems redesign tools and interventions all around the world, including Ghana. As much as possible, IHI practices what it preaches. In addition to encouraging health care systems and health care professionals to employ the model of improvement to make the delivery of health care more efficient, reliable, and effective, all of IHI’s own work is continuously evaluated for improvement. After living and breathing quality improvement for a year, the transition to medical school, where the focus sometimes felt like mindless memorization of volumes of facts, was difficult.

My main motivation for coming to Ghana this summer to work on clinical quality and management research was to return to the field of quality improvement of health care. For the most part, my research has been very fulfilling as I have delved into answering the questions: what kinds of improvements can be made at the level of a district hospital to improve maternal health and how can those improvements be made? Since data is the backbone and currency of quality improvement, sometimes answering my objective questions has been frustrating because I continuously run into underdeveloped data and information systems. On the days that I felt particularly beat by data available to me, I’d wonder how IHI functions in Ghana.


Lambussie QI Meeting

IHI has three developing countries programs: Ghana, South Africa, and Malawi. In Ghana, Project Fives Alive, a partnership with the National Catholic Health Service (NCHS) and Ghana Health Service (GHS) is working towards reducing under five mortality through quality improvement. While I was working at IHI, the CEO, Don Berwick, made a short visit to Ghana and collected the most inspiring stories. Thanks to Nana Twum-Danso, Project Fives Alive director and Ernest Kanyoke, Project Fives Alive Project Officer, I had the opportunity to be inspired too.


Piina QI Team

Last week, I traveled to Wa in the upper west region of Ghana to join Project Fives Alive on two days of quality improvement (QI) meetings at various health centers and CHPS zones. It was a difficult journey up to Wa from Kumasi, but those troubles immediately melted away when I met Ernest. If it were possible to anthropomorphize quality improvement, Ernest would be the perfect model. He is brimming with energy and is whole-heartedly committed to quality improvement in his work and his everyday life. Upon arrival, when my hotel reservation was not processed correctly, Ernest immediately evaluated that this was due to a problem in hand-offs and he said he wished had time to help by first collecting data on how often this occurs. At the very least, seeing Ernest carry around a flip chart and colored markers conjured up feelings of comfort. IHI truly is flourishing in Ghana.


Lambussie Health Center

Because I arrived in Wa around 2:30AM and had to be up and ready for site visits at 7AM, Thursday’s meetings were tough. Immediately after Ernest’s more than deserved introduction of myself to the QI teams, I’d invariably fall asleep. I am still so ashamed that in response to the amazing work that these health centers are doing to reduce neonatal deaths, all I could give them was an inattentive, silent, sleeping Eva. Thankfully, even while sleeping, I think my brain was still alert and I gathered some truly remarkable accounts of the QI work being done by midlevel providers (midwives, community health nurses, and local support staff) to drastically improve the processes that can reduce neonatal mortality.


Samoa QI Team

For example, in Samoa, the two CHPS Zones have greatly improved their skilled delivery rate by making small changes to make delivering at a health center attractive for mothers. These changes include offering traditional porridge to the women after delivery. This small change does not just represent a inventive adaptation of traditional practices, but also sends the message that the health care staff cares about the well-being of the mother and that the health centers are welcome institutions. In Karni, the QI team discussed the progress of their intervention to reach out to women and develop a pregnancy plan to increase their skilled delivery rates, which are at a laudable 90+% and a very effective mosquito net distribution program that has reduced their rates of malaria admissions.


Karni QI Meeting

What impressed me the most was not the outstanding results and outcomes that these health centers can celebrate, but the dynamics of the QI meeting itself. The health center staff have no formal training in statistics, yet after just a few learning sessions, are very data driven. Midwives and community health nurses take turns contributing to and facilitating the QI meeting to discuss and evaluate the rates of first trimester registrants for prenatal care and improving postnatal care follow-up visits. During the meeting, their various registers (the raw data), are always open right in front of them and they reference the data throughout the meeting. The connection between data and the individual patient success narratives they are experiencing is strong and solid. I can’t say that even providers in the US have made this connection. The foundations of QI have been laid for these teams and with that, I believe that they can take on any health care delivery challenge.


Exuberant Ernest Working His Magic

All of this progress, however, could not have been possible without the skillful facilitation of the project officers. The project officers not only have a deep understanding of the individual process and quality measures and interventions that each health center is undertaking, but are also experts at managing relationships. Project Fives Alive is a partnership with the NCHS and GHS are extremely important agencies to work with for the success of its work. The project officer has mobilized and empowered all of the necessary stakeholders to participate in the shared goal of reducing under five mortality. A representative from the GHS district health office traveled with us and was present at every QI meeting. All levels of staff were asked to open their registers and discuss and interpret the data. And then together, the QI team would set aims and deadlines to meet before the next QI meeting. My own research experience has proven that this is no easy task. Building confidence and a positive attitude among the providers is on an entirely higher level. The hospitals that I visited were still struggling with just making sure all of the necessary stakeholders that would work together to improve maternal mortality were all available on the same day at the same time to just discuss maternal deaths. These project officers, like Ernest, have just the right combination of encouragement and persistence to have led the QI teams to where they are now.


Run-chart at Piina

The four sites that I visited were extremely resource deprived in comparison to the district hospitals that I have spent most of my time working with—most of the health centers do not have electricity! Yet, despite these resource challenges, look how far a statement like, “let’s take a look at the data” can go. The run charts and meeting minutes posted on the wall is really the only technology I saw that these facilities were using to achieve their results. It’s phenomenal. The next waves of the project are to expand and replicate the work being done in the northern regions to the rest of Ghana. This kind of exposure to QI has so much potential that I know whenever I have the opportunity to return to Ghana, the health care delivery system in Ghana will be positively unrecognizable.


The Fearless Issah

My site visits and time spent with the Project Fives Alive team was the perfect burst of inspiration that I needed as I begin to undertake my last small project before I have to return to Michigan. Perhaps it was Issah’s adroit driving skills that powered us through sometimes as much as 300km of dirt roads to reach these communities, but after just two days with Ernest (and his highly marketable energy if only extractable) and the community QI teams, I’m excited for my own project with the confidence that QI works successfully in resource-poor settings like Ghana. With more opportunities for these community teams to share, evaluate, and celebrate their work and even greater individual engagement with data, the results that Project Fives Alive will produce I think will exceed the already achieved success. Three cheers for Project Fives Alive!

Thank you again to Nana Twum-Danso and Ernest Kanyoke for this amazing opportunity to join you all for two days. I look forward to following Project Fives Alive as it continues to grow and spread.

For more information about IHI and Project Fives Alive, here are some relevant links:
Project Fives Alive Website
Fives Alive Project Description
On the Ground Account When IHI's Jane Visited Ghana

For more blog posts about my summer in Ghana, visit "Eva Ghana Wild"

Costs of Care: Cost containment and unfinished business

Costs of Care: Cost containment and unfinished business

Healthcare reform's unfinished business

While the contentious healthcare reform bill enables access to health insurance for 32 million Americans, what about costs and efficient healthcare delivery?

The often-heard criticism of the 10-year, 1 trillion healthcare reform plan is that it simply does not do enough to rein in the cost of treatments. According to a government report released in February this year, healthcare spending grew to a record of 17.3 % of the GDP in 2009, $ 134 billion more than 2008, marking the largest one-year jump in its share of the economy since the government started keeping such records half a century ago.

The question then is, how does ObamaCare plan to deal with the American view of more care is better care? Given that the new healthcare overhaul requires the government to now pick up more of the healthcare tab, can we cope with that? Moreover, how do we convince patients and providers that new procedures, tests, drugs or devices that might save or improve lives really are not always necessary or worth the exorbitant prices?

A stark example of the inefficiency in the system was brought to bear in a recent study published in JAMA about the rise in unnecessary back surgeries. Despite the growing evidence that it does not really work well for patients and increases the likelihood of life threatening conditions like heart attacks, strokes and pneumonia,complex back surgeries have increased 15-fold between 2002 and 2007. In essence, more complex procedures mean higher payments for surgeons. The misaligned financial incentives, the paucity of patient education about less invasive treatment options and the trying-anything-and-everything mentality in medical practice even if we’re not sure it works are all part of the problem.

And it’s not just more back surgeries. More CT scans pose a problem too. A recent study demonstrated the significant overuse of such scans, projecting that 15,000 people die in a given year due to the radiation received from CT scans. Caesarean births have become more common, with little benefit to babies and significant burden to mothers. Men who would never have died from prostate cancer have been treated for it and left incontinent or impotent. Cardiac stenting and bypasses, with all their side effects, have become popular partly because people think they reduce heart attacks.

Overall, the consensus is that culture change is needed to move away from wasteful spending to more efficient healthcare. They include new making doctors more sensitive to costs of care, establishing new payment methods for doctors, more comparative- effectiveness research and penalizing hospitals for inefficiency. The hope is that the Patient-Oriented Outcomes Research institute established by the healthcare Bill, charged with setting the national agenda for the comparative- effectiveness studies, as well as providing more money and disseminating results, will bring some order into the chaos of practicing medicine. The hope is that it's studies will have an impact on healthcare delivery.

Shooting for "Sensemaking" in Health Care

Despite my lackluster sports careers in tennis and Ultimate Frisbee, I am a huge sports enthusiast. In college, I was introduced to basketball. My hometown team, the Miami Heat had fought their way to the 2006 NBA Finals. Like any good fan, my eyes were glued to the TV every game against the Dallas Mavericks. I gasped at every missed shot, held my breath during every free throw shot, and cheered for every point scored. The Miami Heat's journey to the championship was epic and I have been enamored with them ever since....

...As much as I love the Miami Heat and have faith in Wade's athletic prowress, I am not hopeful about tonight's game. Using Weick's own words, the Miami Heat are not a high reliability organization, an organization that operates under very trying conditions all the time and still manages to have fewer than their fair share of accidents, but should be...

Click here to read the full post on the IHI Open School Blog

An Evening of Thanks

I have a little over a month left of my first of year of medical school...an unbelievable fact. One of the highlights of my year has been the Family Centered Experience program. I have written about the program in previous posts here and here. Closing up our year, all first year med students were asked to work in small groups and create an interpretive project using untraditional media to express our understanding of what we have learned from our patient volunteers. Tonight, all of our interpretive projects were on display and we spent the evening with our classmates and patient volunteers experiencing the reinterpretation of the struggles and triumphs of a life with illness...

Go to the IHI Open School Blog to read the full post!

This is the Clinic that Will and Charlie Built...

I have officially become a groupie of the quality improvement in health care movement. Books sitting on my nightstand include: Pauline Chen's Final Exam, Super Crunchers by Ian Ayres, and How to Change the World by David Bornstein. I squealed like I had just sighted Brad Pitt when Atul Gawande's latest book, The Checklist Manifesto arrived at my door. Instead of simply saying that I need to clean my apartment, I specifically think that I need to "5S" my kitchen and desk. In order to stay fit and get rid of the belly fat I've grown since starting medical school, I am now in PDSA cycle 3 for a 30 minute exercise routine that I can reliably perform every day. The latest sign that I am a quality improvement junkie is my weekend pilgrimage to Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.



This past weekend the AMSA Chapter at Mayo Clinic hosted a Patient Safety and Quality Care Conference at Mayo Clinic. The Mayo Clinic has not only been one of President Obama's shining examples of high quality care at low costs since he began his health reform push early last year, but has also consistently popped up during my experience at IHI as a health system that has truly embraced the IOM aim of patient-centeredness. Even though I'm buried underneath the dorsal columns of my central nervous system sequence, this was an opportunity I could not miss...

Click here to read the full blog post on the IHI Open School Blog.

"What Do I Need to Know for My Clerkships?": A Look at the Lucian Leape Institute Report on Medical Education

In the world of medical school, spring is a time of transitions. First year medical students are returning from spring break and gearing up for the last stretch of class before summer. Second year medical students are getting ready to buckle down and study for the USMLE Step 1 board exam (good luck to all!). Third year students are on their last clerkship rotations before becoming fourth year medical students. And fourth year medical students are holding their breath as Match Day approaches (this Thursday!). Like any time of transition there are a lot of questions about the future floating around. One of the most honest and interesting questions I have heard recently was from a second year student to a resident, "What do I need to know for my third year clerkships?"

This may sound like a strange question to those outside of the world of medicine. The third year of medical school should be a logical progression from the second year, right? Not exactly. Most medical schools in the United States are structured so that the first two years are spent predominantly in lecture. The first year covers the normal physiology, anatomy, and biochemistry of the body systems and the second year delves into pathology and pathophysiology. These years are marked by long hours in class and little, if any, patient interaction. With at most a two week gap after the USMLE Step 1 exam, third year medical students are then thrown into the hospital wards to learn how to apply the basic sciences into the practice of patient care. Are these new third year medical students ready to care for patients?

The Lucian Leape Institute of the National Patient Safety Foundation says, "no." Just last week, the Lucian Leape Institute released its first of a series of reports on patient safety. The first report, titled: “Unmet Needs: Teaching Physicians to Provide Safe Patient Care,” finds that U.S. medical schools are not adequately teaching students how to provide safe patient care. Click here to read the report....

Read the full post on the IHI Open School Blog

Understanding the Incomplete Medical Diagnosis

*names and some details have been changed to maintain and protect privacy*

If multiple sclerosis was an anatomy review item, I can just imagine Dr. Zeller pointing at the spinal cord and asking me, “Eva, what is the clinical presentation of multiple sclerosis?” After overcoming the anxiety of being “pimped,” my response would probably include symptoms such as: muscle weakness, difficulty in moving, difficulty with balance, visual problems, fatigue, and pain. Before meeting my patient volunteer, Casey, that’s how I characterized multiple sclerosis. The mental image in my head also included a wheelchair. This snapshot of multiple sclerosis is the medical mold that physicians give to their patients upon diagnosis, which I used to think was complete and scientifically correct.

After almost six months with Casey, I now understand that this sort of medical mold is incomplete. This medical mold is analogous to giving an unknowing sculptor a headless cast of Michaelangelo’s David and telling him that this represented Michaelangelo’s complete masterpiece. What was missing in the medical mold of multiple sclerosis (MS)?

What was missing was Casey...

Click here to read the full post on the IHI Open School Blog!

Being Honest: Ducking Out from Under the Table

My adorable dog, May, has her flaws. Her bark and temper are infamous in our neighborhood. If the toy is not made of rubber, it will become an unrecognizable ball of mush within days. However, when it comes to going out to do her business, May almost never has accidents. On those rare occasions she has does have an accident, she hides under the dining room table instead of running to greet us when we arrive home.

We understand why these accidents happen. Analogous to most medical errors, May's accident is a systems error. These accidents only occur when we leave the house for a long period of time without allowing her to go out before we leave. May was not being negligent or purposefully filthy; the system she lives in simply does not allow her to successfully avoid these accidents...

...Medical malpractice is one of the few bipartisan goals of the current health reform battle. However, how to reform this messy process that is hard on all participants (physicians, hospitals, patients and families, and insurers) emotionally and financially is not as clear. Focusing on how to minimize costly lawsuits through caps on financial damages awarded to patients further complicates the fundamental courtesies that should occur when a mistake happens: acknowledgement, understanding, acceptance, and forgiveness...

Click here to read the full post on the IHI Open School Blog.

Too many drugs?

Ever wondered about the contents in your medicine cabinet? Or the forces that got you on those prescription medications in the first place?

This NPR editorial does a great job bringing to light how Merck’s Fosamax for ostopenia, a condition deemed treatable by this drug, got into the cabinets of million women across America. And how the marketing of the pill changed the definition of bone disease and sought women to seek unnecessary treatment.

This pharmaceuticalisation phenomenon, meaning the pharma companies quest to turn every research endeavor into a blockbuster drug highlights the manipulative role of drug companies in deciding what constitutes the definition of a disease just so they can market a drug to cure it.

Set against the backdrop of the controversial evolution of ostopenia as a disease, we read about how pharma companies are vying to get the FDA to sign off on a prescription pill for jet lag! Do we really need a pill for jet lag? Or worse yet, should we let the pharmaceutical industry decide which drugs fit what therapies? With spiraling healthcare costs are we going to let pharmaceutical companies hold the reigns?

More importantly, can we draw the line between treatment, research and development for the greater good versus drugs that are downright redundant?

Practicing medicine by numbers

In a system of upside down incentives – a fee-for-service payment model that results in doctors doing too much – more tests, more procedures and more treatments, left almost entirely up to a doctors “informed intuition”.

Intuition indeed is necessary in medicine, explains Jerome Groopman, in How Doctors Think, but can lead doctors astray. Numbers on the other hand can help resolve quality variation by data-driven methods.

After years of knowing the benefits of beta-blocker prescriptions, safety checklists and so called ‘evidence based practices’, what keeps doctors from doing what they know? Can we afford to rely on the variability of their good judgment and intuition? Why are quality managing practices like lean and Six Sigma facing so much resistance in the practice of healthcare?

Quite simply put, because we trust our doctors to do what is best for us. Hospitals and physicians that provide less than top-quality care are rarely punished. There is that, and how we pay for healthcare. Volume care is compensated, irrespective of the added value for patients.

In the midst of the country’s struggle to health reform (or lack thereof),this article offers a refreshing look at what can be done right. Brendt James – the champion of the ‘Intermountain way’ challenges doctors to continuously test and tweak protocols, set clinical goals, track patient outcomes and deliver quality care at low costs – offers reason for optimism.